Alles was Sie tun müssen um ein Premium- (GOLD) Mitglied auf Lebenszeit zu werden und diese Funktion freizuschalten, ist, einmalig irgendeine Anzahl von Token zu kaufen!
After a brief spurt of debate over the claim that “97% of relevant published papers support anthropogenic climate change”, I think the picture has mostly settled to an agreement that – although we can contest the methodology of that particular study – there are multiple lines of evidence that the number is somewhere in the nineties.
We take no responsibility for the content on any webpage which we link to, please use your own discretion while surfing the links.
In the same way, Newton’s theory of gravity wasn’t quite as good as Einstein’s, but this would not shame physicists in the same way climate change being wrong would shame climatologists.We do not own, produce or host the videos displayed on this website.All videos are hosted by 3rd party websites and we have no control over their contents.So they promoted Lysenko enough times that everyone got the message that Lysenkoism was the road to getting good positions.All the careerists switched over to the new paradigm, and the holdouts who continued to believe in genetics were denounced as fascists.Before we investigate, we should define our reference class properly. It was part of a really important theory, one of the fundamental paradigms of an entire field.I think a scientific mistake only counts as a reason for doubting climate change (or any other commonly-accepted scientific paradigm) if: 1. Aristotle was wrong about all sorts of things, and so were those doctors who thought everything had to do with black bile, but the scientific community back then was a lot less rigorous than our own. I’m sure some tiny group of biologists have been wrong about how many chromosomes a shrew has, but that’s probably an easier mistake to wander into than all of climatology screwing up simultaneously. It was a stubborn resistance to the truth, rather than just a failure to have come up with the correct theory immediately.According to Wikipedia, “in 1948, genetics was officially declared “a bourgeois pseudoscience”; all geneticists were fired from their jobs (some were also arrested), and all genetic research was discontinued.” About twenty years later the Soviets quietly came to their senses and covered up the whole thing.I would argue that Stalinist Russia, where the government was very clearly intervening in science and killing the people it didn’t like, isn’t a fair test case for a theory today.Wenn Sie mit der Funktion des Flash Players auf Ihrem Computer unglücklich sind, versuchen Sie bitte auf die HTML5-Version der Seite umzuschalten, indem Sie auf den "Kippschalter" klicken.Denken Sie jedoch bitte daran, dass die HTML5-Version der Seite stark eingeschränkte Funktionen besitzt (nicht optimale Videoqualität und die Möglichkeit von verzögertem Streaming).